What is CABS?

This site will help high school students and teachers find original, independent science research topics and questions that can be done without a professional lab...these can be done in a school lab or even in one's basement! The project ideas and research questions being developed and presented here have been vetted and could lead to true discoveries, and not just finding already known results. See our Welcome message. These are the types of projects that could be done and submitted to high school contests such as the Regeneron Science Talent Search, Junior Science and Humanities Symposium, or the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair, and be competitive. If you have an idea to share, or a question about one of the project ideas, contact us at vondracekm@eths202.org.

Pages (on the right side of the screen) have lists of ideas for different types of science research projects, and clicking on one of those ideas will take you to posts with details and all sorts of information about that type of project. Get more information about why there is a need for CABS!

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

NASA Perseverance Landing

 Mark your calendars for Thursday, February 18, at 1:15 pm Central/2:15 pm Eastern time, for the landing of NASA's Perseverance lander on Mars! 

There is an entire toolkit for this event, so check it out. Think about all the areas of STEM that come together to make this ridiculously complex mission take place...this is part of the set of opportunities that are out there for today's students. SO exciting!! 

Friday, January 22, 2021

STEM Writing Contest with New York Times

 For the writers out there: 

New Student Opportunity: 2nd NYTimes/Science News STEM Writing Contest!

Science News in High Schools and The New York Times Learning Network together invite students to participate in the 2nd annual STEM Writing Contest. Students will choose an issue or question in STEM that interests them and then write a 500-word explanation that will engage and enlighten readers. Here is a rubric for the contest, which is open to students                   ages 11–19. 

Student submissions are due on Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time. Winning entries will be published on The New York Times Learning Network. You can read last year’s winning essays  here.

Wednesday, January 6, 2021

Have the Scientist Mindset - Seemingly "Simple" things are typically Complex!!

 One of the constant reminders I tell my students is that "reality is always more complex than the textbook problem." And our goal is to dig into things and events that we all take for granted every day, and try to find the complexities in the seemingly simple. Here's one example of what we mean by this: 

You have a superball, hold it some height above the floor, and then drop it. That's it, seems incredibly simple! And we all have done this, and know what happens. It hits the floor, and bounces back up to nearly the same height from which we dropped it. 

What's the key word in this description???? What indicates within our observation that this is trickier than we tend to think????

"Nearly." The best superball in the world cannot make it back to its original height. The world's best pendulum or swing or roller coaster can never make it back to their original heights. The scientist's question is, of course, why is this the case with everything we can think of that starts high, goes down and tries to return to the same height? 

When the superball falls, it is moving through air. There is air friction acting on it, and that interaction, that rubbing and collisions with air molecules, creates heat, which means there is a loss in kinetic energy. The ball then collides with the ground. ANY material in a collision get partially deformed during the collision. The two surfaces produce forces on each other and bend/deform/compress each other. The atoms and molecules in the two surfaces have their bonds disturbed, and are vibrating faster in their lattice positions...basically a shock wave goes through the materials. This is all internal heat and movements of atoms and molecules...it is taking more kinetic energy away from the ball during its journey. We hear the superball hit the ground - sound energy is produced during collisions, and that is a small loss of energy from the ball. It starts moving back up, through air, and more heat is released due to air friction. 

All of this complexity, usually at small distances where the atoms and molecules themselves are being affected drastically, all requires energy of the system, and it is impossible for any object to bounce back to its original height. 

If you can start to think about reality differently than the general conceptual approach of most textbooks, then you are thinking like the scientist. And this opens the door to all sorts of research questions, as we can then investigate how significant a specific parameter or effect has on a system! This is the CABS approach, and is why we can always find good, original research questions in everyday things, and don't always need the million dollar laboratory to do real, good research!! 

HAPPY 2021!!! Let the exploring and curiosity begin!!!!

Monday, December 28, 2020

For Girls - Kode with Klossy this summer!

 A two-week, intense, but FREE, summer coding camp that has a focus on girls is Kode with Klossy. This comes recommended by students who have taken it, and they loved it. Coding is part of any area of science at this point, so everyone should plan on having a course or other experience where the opportunity to learn to code (in whatever language) is available. Check it out, girls! 

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

Phys.Org's Top 20 articles for 2020

 Some really fascinating research and results coming from the top 20 articles from phys.org. 

Check some out, and enjoy! Let these motivate you to be one of the next scientists to make memorable and important discoveries! 

Friday, November 27, 2020

Hydraulic jump - Effects on a jump of shape of object jet lands on

 Here's a really interesting experimental idea that can lead to a vast number of variations for students to create an original research study. Set up a hydraulic jump experiment, which consists of a water source and a stream of falling water (i.e. the water jet in a jump experiment) that lands on a hard surface. 

The idea is to put a 3D object of whatever shape at the location where the jet of water is supposed to land on a flat surface. The water in the jet flows over the surface of the object, and then onto the flat surface, where the experimentalist then measures whatever jump and pattern that takes place. Here is an example of an experiment where hemispheres, spheres, cubes and cylinders were used. Students can use whatever shaped objects they have lying around their house or school lab, or they can design and create any shaped 3D object with a 3D printer, ceramics, clay, or other material that is available. 

Numerous options await - be creative with the shapes of the objects being used. Measure the flow patterns and any jumps that form under a wide variety of conditions. You can vary the height from which the water jet falls, the diameter of the jet, the dimensions of the object on which a water jet falls, the material from which the 3D object is made, the orientation of the object relative to the jet, and so on. One may nbe interested in trying to find a mathematical parameter that should be added to theoretical treatments of hydraulic jump, when one needs to account for the shape of the surface water lands on. 

Friday, November 20, 2020

6 Questions Physicists ask when evaluating a scientific claim of discovery

 To many, science is the process of discovery and trying to find the 'facts' of how the world works. It is supposed to be unbiased, nonpartisan, and pure. But don't ever forget that science is done and practiced by human beings, all of whom are imperfect, have biases, and make mistakes, just like everyone else. We are not 'all knowing' and have all the answers, and we never will. 

Having said this, what is the real story for how scientists go about their work? How do we know whether or not to believe a scientific claim by others? How and why should we evaluate others' work to justify their conclusions, especially when it is something important in the field or something never seen or claimed by anyone before? 

Check out this nice piece, from Symmetry magazine (this is very good if you like particle physics), which uses examples from particle physics to demonstrate how science is actually a little messy, but most importantly human - and 'facts' in science do change! Scientists are willing to change their minds over time as new results, often the result of new technologies and methods and data sets, because discovering real truth is a long, difficult process. There always is and should be debate and skepticism, but also open minds that are willing to accept new results that contradict old ones. There needs to be an open process or peer reviewed publications and presentations at conferences, so other experts can review a colleague's work openly and completely to check for mistakes or misinterpretations of the data. This is why it takes time to do science the 'right way.'