A favorite quote - and it's relevant to the present

 One of my favorite quotes comes from the legendary physicist Richard Feynman: 

"Just because you know the name of something, does not mean you know something." 

I see this as one of the primary pathways of people believing conspiracy theories, and falling for mis- and dis-information, for instance. People throw around scientific terms and names of theories and names of ideas, as if they know what any of it means or what the consequences are - these may just be something they saw in a headline on social media or a site of a favorite 'influencer' or politician. Then they repeat it, as fact, and with confidence since they know a fancy-sounding name or idea. These instances are often based on just hearing a name or title or single idea. But as happens SO MUCH, with people consuming news and information in an age of short Tik Tok videos, Reels, or 200-character tweets or messages, about SERIOUSLY COMPLEX AND COMPLICATED ISSUES that require true expertise to begin to understand the issues, just knowing the name of something does not mean one knows, AT ALL, anything substantial or accurate about that something! 

Falling into the trap of fooling oneself they know what they are talking about because they can repeat a name or quote by an "influencer", without seriously understanding ANYTHING about the topic or issue, helps give birth to conspiracy theories, misunderstandings, and the rapid spread of mis- and dis-information. And this is, as we are seeing here and around the world, causing some serious splits in whole societies. It is also leading to a deterioration in the value of expertise, and mistrust of science itself, that has created the very technologies and ways of life of world civilizations. From climate change, to medicine and vaccinations, to evolution, new energy sources, to food science and nutrition, to advanced technologies like intelligent robotics, AI, and quantum computing, and so on, people are throwing names and ideas around they've heard from non-experts and using those as 'knowledge and facts', despite not know the details about those names and ideas. It's a dangerous practice, and has real consequences on our future.

All sorts of possibilities for studies in any field via Computational Research!

  Check out this site, for the Wolfram HS Research Program. The possibilities for research in the computational realm are endless! 

If you enjoy coding, or want to learn coding, and want to use it to explore research questions, wow, there are some cool thing you can do! Lots of options and ideas here, on our CABS page. 

Some thoughts about: EELS as class pets, and how Quantum Mechanics changed my view of students (and humans generally)

 Go here to find deeper dives into EELS as class pets, where EELS stands for Everyday Essential Life Skills and a renaming and rebranding of SEL

Go here to find deeper dives into how Quantum Mechanics changed my view and mindset of who my students are (and humans generally), which I believe needs to happen with all educators across the country, regardless of grade levels taught. See my TED talk about some of this.

Feel free to share on your social media platforms. Teachers, feel free to use any/all of this! 

#SEL #mindset #EduReforms #EducationMindset #education #teaching

Jets of water that break up into droplets - what might be going on?!

 This is a good summary article of some research into how jets of water, such as from sinks, hoses, and drinking fountains, break up into droplets of water. It is a common, everyday sort of phenomenon, but we can still learn about it since there are many ways one can create jets of water, and vary what happens to form those droplets.

A Climate Report, if interested

 This is a recently published report showing evidence of climate change and global warming. Check it out if interested; it is always a good idea to actually see why scientists have been predicting and measuring climate change, induced by humans, since the late 1960s, when oil companies of all entities developed the first climate models. 

**WORTH THE WATCH: Where is AI leading the human race?**

AI has revolutionized many areas of research, but the bigger picture is very rapidly not looking as promising. 

Although this develops a very dark, maddening, and scary scenario for the future of humanity, it is the reality of our time that AI, and the quest of a handful of companies to "win the race" of AI dominance, is leading us down a potentially ridiculous pathway that limits human beings in what they will be able to do, and how one will be able to find purpose in life. 

This conversation between Jon Stewart and Tristan Harris is worth the watch - although terrifying, it is something we all should see, think about, debate, and take action by telling our representatives to actually WAKE UP and DO SOMETHING about developing guidelines, policies, regulations, and laws about what we want to happen with AI (and its integration into robotics and quantum computing). This will not be easy because it will fly in the face of what the AI Tech leaders want, who are all Mega-wealthy and powerful and integrated into the political world already, BUT WE HAVE TO TRY to build in something that still allows human beings to have purpose in this world. 

Keep in mind that just a few days prior to this post, Amazon announced it will be reducing its workforce by as much as 600,000 (one-third of its present workforce) by 2033, as they will be replaced by robots; they plan on automating 75% of its operations. This is happening in the present, and is no longer just a 'sci-fi' type possibility. 

New research explores how matter won out over antimatter after the Big Bang

 New research out of the big particle accelerator in Europe (CERN) is the first to show something called CP violation in the class of particles that include the proton and neutron - baryons. Baryons are particles that are made of combinations of 3 quarks; my students should know that protons are up-up-down and neutrons are up-down-down combinations, for example. 

CP violation is a phenomenon in particle physics that gets a little technical, but basically if differences in these 'symmetries' are found between what we call normal matter and antimatter (e.g. an antiproton has all the same properties of protons, only with a negative charge instead of positive), it can be a possible explanation for why matter won out over antimatter right after the Big Bang happened. 

This is also a good example of how science will never end, that there are always new things to explore and both big and small questions to try and answer by looking at Nature! Below is a representation of the Standard Model, and the particles responsible for the observable universe.